SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.78+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (111360)9/26/2000 12:43:15 PM
From: pgerassi  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Dear Elmer:

Why spend $3000 on a computer when a $10 unit performs the task better? Why use a tactical Nuke when a firecracker can do the job? For the applications Intel is touting (MPEG compression and moving data from one area to another), there currently exists specialized hardware that outruns the P4 (MPEG 2 compression is done real time on a $300 (soon it can be done a a $25 chip) plug in board whereas the P4 cannot do it at more than 10% real time and for data movement, a $1 (if that) DMA chip outruns it).

The more apt comparison is a Dragster (P4) against a World Rally Racer (Tbird). In drag races, the P4 might come out ahead (some times substantially), but which one would you use to go to the grocery store? Commuting to work? On a trip from SF to Washington? Most of the time?

Remember when Intel touted MMX? That has turned out to be a yawner at best. Intel touted Rambus as the future too. The P4 is Intel trying to make into a DSP. Sorry, that market is capably held by TI, Motorola, et al, for a heck of a lot less money. This market (the General Purpose CPU) does not give much for SP (Single Purpose) CPU designs. We want our CPUs to be like 4x4s (go anywhere) not dragsters (one way or else).

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext