SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CIMA who started this subject9/26/2000 6:52:01 PM
From: jamesandrews   of 1239
 
Excellent news. (From Raging Bull)

I think that these results are really good. They confirm once again that UTEM is a very reliable indicator of ore bodies on this property; they continue to be batting 100% on this.

As per a previous post, two holes in such a large area as the M zone don't speak strongly to grades and tonnages--except in making the massively important point that the M zone *is* an ore body.

PGMs on these two holes were very high; cobalt was high. Ni was fairly low, and Cu is, IMHO, irrelevant to this project.

So far, 'the market' is disappointed, and this does show that there are a fair number of short term speculators holding stock. If the results were, say, double what they actually were, I suppose the stock price would have soared--but would have done so on the same kind of as yet unreliable information about grades that seems to be lowering the price right now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News