SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 147.42+2.2%Jan 27 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rarebird who wrote (58945)9/27/2000 10:53:40 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) of 116927
 
From the writings of Sir Edward Coke in the 1520's England thru today,this has been very near the meaning of the term monopoly:

Monopoly
Control by one or a few companies of the manufacture, sale, distribution, or price of something. A monopoly may be prohibited if, for example, a company deliberately drives out competition.
Oran's Dictionary of the Law
lawoffice.com

Monopoly
A commercial advantage enjoyed by only one or a select few companies in which only those companies can trade in a certain area. Some monolopoies are legal, such as those temporarily created by patents. Others are secretly built by conspiracy between two or more companies and are prohibited by law.
duhaime.org

You will note that the direction of the manipulation is not that which places it outside the law, rather the sole fact undoes competition. Thus when Clinton sold oil from the strategic reserves(as a bonus to Gore) to OXY, into a soft market, he broke(at the very least) this law.

Does not the same finding apply to those selling excessive paper gold into this soft market so as to control price?

As to Bush "selling his soul" to the moral majority, were you running against a sitting VP(who has proven to take the public's money)would you turn away any money? Is money evil or only what it might buy? The question will be if those donations have put him at odds with the law or the public good or if they buy legal change or additional consideration?

This can only be answered after the fact, we know what was bought & sold via donations under Gore/Clinton. There is little such proof in the recent history of Texas under Bush.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext