SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 92.35-0.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sylvester80 who wrote (55549)9/27/2000 6:16:44 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (4) of 93625
 
Hi sylvester80; If you look carefully through the Sun documentation from back in October 1999, you will find a note where they said that their processor core was independent of the memory interface. The MAJC core is compatible with SDRAM, and it was the designers intention that it be easily adaptable to whatever memory type it needed to adapt to.

<FUD Warning!>
Given that it was in October '99 that it became obvious (to those of us in the business) that RDRAM was never going to come to parity in price with SDRAM, the timing of these delays in MAJC's release are beginning to smell an awful lot like a change in memory interface from RDRAM to DDR or SDRAM.
<End FUD Warning!>

Scumbria's point about the $200 RDRAM is valid, even if his pricing is a bit obscure. There has to be quite a large markup between cost of goods sold and retail in order for a product to pay for all the other stuff. Typical ratios would be around 3 for fairly high volume products. For high end products, the ratios have to go much higher. That is why a $500 Nvidia based graphics card only has about $120 worth of components on it. Two RDRAM chips at about $25 each increases the retail price of the product by about $200.

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext