SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 483.03+0.5%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Tutt who wrote (50171)9/27/2000 10:17:09 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
That the SC thought it was no big deal is ONE conclusion one can draw, but not the only conclusion. The Supreme Court is perfectly capable of making a political decision--a decision where most of the members believe, right or wrong, that the lower appellate court should be allowed to review the case. The real conclusion may be that Judge Jackson's order to split the company is the wrong solution, but the Supreme Court justices don't know what is the right solution, or if some period of limbo might make it clearer ultimately whether Microsoft is CURRENTLY a monopolist or whether the label was appropriate only at the time the case was originally brought.

But since I'm an investor, my real concern is what's best for shareholders, and as I've tried to point out, keeping the company as one humongous monolith isn't in the shareholders best interests.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext