Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 106.06

-0.8%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sylvester80 who wrote (55900)	9/29/2000 4:21:52 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (2) of 93625

Carl and Scumbria, Mr Gwennap added that when Intel began work on Timna two years ago, the trend in PC markets was toward sharply lower prices and it seemed that $400 PCs would be selling in large volumes by 2000. At such low price points, an integrated chip such as Timna would have saved PC makers a significant amount in manufacturing costs. But the sub-$500 PC market failed to become a large segment of the overall PC market. Again, since you guys like to blame Rambus for everything, we'll start checking the reasons given for cancelling Timna. So far we have one for "sub-$500 PC market failed to become a large segment of the overall PC market." Therefore no need for Timna, whether it's RDRAM-based or SDRAM-based. Dave

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next