Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.81

+0.2%

Nov 25 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (111955)	9/30/2000 8:08:10 PM
From: muzosi	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Why is AMD's ThumperTurd 33% LARGER that Intel's Coppermine - 120 sq.mm vs. 90 sq. mm? They both have 256K L2 cache, although the Thumpy has 128K L1 vs. 32K for the Coppermine ... Intel has surpassed them at the 0.18 micron level in density your jump from the second statement to the third is illogical. Athlon has exactly %33 more cache and you have no idea about how many transistors Athlon has. How can you make the third claim ? Oh I forget; according to the amd thread clown P3 1.13 works... on most software. Muzo

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next