SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: enzyme who wrote (108628)10/1/2000 6:29:31 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (4) of 1571031
 
Enzyme, re: LDT article,

Thanks for the article. Assuming Charles Mitchell of AMD has his facts altogether, there are a lot of things I did not know about LDT:

<AMD is trying to establish LDT as a universal interconnect, a single bus for what Mitchell calls "the bus hodge-podge" of PCI, Accelerated Graphics Port, DRAM, and other dedicated high-bandwidth buses inside a computer>

Very interesting. I did not know AMD was this ambitious with LDT. And I thought it was just going to be a scalable interconnect for high-end servers, which in itself is a very compelling technology.

<Dean Klein, vice president of the integrated products group at Micron Technology Inc., Boise, Idaho, praised the new bus, even deeming it a potential replacement for PCI.>

Whatever happened to PCI-X? Infiniband? Both are already open standards, very mature in their development, and have the top OEMs supporting it, including Compaq, HP, IBM, Dell, etc. I have my doubts regarding this "potential replacement for PCI," since it's already a little late in the game.

Then again, LDT was mentioned as a technology that is being considered for PCI-X bridge chips, among other applications. At least that use makes sense.

<To date, AMD said 40 hardware companies have signed on as LDT partners.>

Would those partners include Compaq, HP, or IBM? Maybe Transmeta? I'm curious. Unfortunately, AMD isn't saying.

<For 32-bit Athlon multiprocessor systems, Mitchell disclosed that a superset of the LDT specification, or "coherent LDT," has been developed for non-uniform memory-access matrixes, where arrays of processors can access dedicated local memory as well as "distant" memory that is attached to other CPUs.>

"Coherent LDT." Guess this is the new name of the scalable interconnect I was referring to earlier.

<the forthcoming Sledgehammer 64-bit microprocessor will contain an integrated north bridge with an LDT connection>

Neat. EV6 will be replaced with LDT, an interconnect w/ much better bandwidth per pin. I wonder if Sledgehammer will also include an integrated memory controller. That should be one serious design of a processor.

Sounds like grand plans for LDT, much grander than I originally thought (or AMD ever revealed in their previous announcements regarding LDT). Man, I wish I could see some of these new LDT design wins, including desktop and server chipsets.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext