SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mr. Whist who wrote (41308)10/1/2000 12:45:30 PM
From: Frank Griffin  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
I really have no first hand knowledge as to the fact that costs and benefits for union workers would be higher. It is just an opinion but it seems, generally, administrative costs would be more with a union. Also, I think it is a general opinion that more workers are required to do the same job in a union setting. That would be much costlier, even though it wouldn't show up in the benefit column. Most workers, today, receive a lot of benefits. I don't know if union workers receive more than non-union workers. Probably about the same. Of course, it is my opinion, and correct me if I am wrong, the employer has to withhold the union dues, account for them, and submit them to the union and that would be an additional exercise for the payroll folks.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News