SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance
NTAP 109.72-1.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Boplicity who wrote (4636)10/2/2000 11:50:58 PM
From: kas1  Read Replies (1) of 10934
 
OT on B2B I own both PPRO and CMRC since I like the rev. sharing aspects compared to ARBA

As a former investor in both CMRC and ARBA (who got burned in the spring), let me share a small insight with you that it took me a little while to realize: buying C1 over Ariba because of their pricing is a bit like buying stock in Rolls-Royce because of its pricing. That is, higher pricing (and in effect C1's pricing is higher) is a double-edged sword. It is a big source of potential revenue -- but only POTENTIAL revenue. Higher prices are a big turnoff to many potential C1 customers.

Especially damaging is this thought-result: the customers who will find C1 solutions least attractive are exactly the customers C1 needs to get to succeed. The bigger the deal flow thru a system, and the more cash the system's backer has in its pockets, the more likely that they'll go for the Ariba product over the C1. It would seem only the cash-poor system backers, with not much expected deal flow, would go for the C1 product. This is just the result of simple cost-benefit analysis on their part.

FWIW, I own neither ARBA nor CMRC (nor FMKT) nowadays, and have gone back to focusing on what's under the hood of all B2B commerce: storage and networks.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext