jlallen--Thank you for correcting me. Funny how you guys sound alike sometimes--LOL! In any event, thank you for your kindness, and providing me yet another opportunity to post what I just wrote, with the correct name inserted (in brackets).
Incidentally, you have an extremely warped variation on what you consider a "party" to be. You know that, don't ya?
Here's the corrected post:
>>>PartyTime: You know it'd be nice if you could prove some of the outlandish remarks you make. Look, in the future, if you're gonna make an accusation like that, please provide a reference to support your comment. OK?<<<
>>>[jlallen]: You made the outlandish claim, PottyTime.<<<
[jlallen], you've demonstrated what I consider as a very typical Republican mean-spirited response. Your refusal to qualify your remarks, when asked, with a reference of any kind, coupled with your name-calling pretty much, I think, well defines the differences between us. I remind you that Bush will have a similar time of it this evening when asked to qualify his tax plan.
I even hope he gets asked a repeat of an earlier question in the campaign: Please name the leaders of the countries which represent the five top trouble spots, hot spots, of conflict in the world.
Remember that one, folks?
He could only come up with one, and even that one was a struggle. Think he knows the answer yet, or do you think he remembered those names? Hard to tell.
Admittedly, he's gotten better. But he's still not qualified to be the president of the United States. Just ask Ronald Reagan's son!
By the way, [jlallen], why couldn't you have simply just supplied a reference to support your accusation? It's all I asked. |
