SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.78+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer who wrote (112313)10/3/2000 8:53:56 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Elmer - RE: "No it's not a joke. 60 deg C is fine provided the boxmaker takes the proper steps to design his system to maintain that temperature. I believe Compaq, HP, IBM, DELL, Gateway and the others have the skills to do that and to suggest otherwise is simply irresponsible."

If 60 deg C is fine for boxmakers, in servers and workstations I presume, why didn't Intel come out with a stepping B0 1GHz PIII Xeon? 933MHz was the max with B0 for the Xeon.

If the revised 1.13GHz PIII has the exact same thermal characteristics as the screwed up one, I bet Intel won't come out with a 1.13GHz PIII Xeon processor based on the C0 stepping.

developer.intel.com

Edit - I see Intel is getting binsplits as low as 700MHz with the new C0 stepping. That mask problem must suck.

developer.intel.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext