>Telling investors that they will make announcements once
>the TMOS patent was secured was a blunder that
>damages credibility. I own NSCT as a high risk stock play.
>If they start to deliver with a single major licensee or
>development agreement, the stock will likely move on to
>new highs. Failing that, the stock is likely to be
>range bound at best.
Agreed on all counts.
NSCT Management has stated repeatedly
in the past year that no move to Nasdaq will be made
until revenues are there. The recent PR regarding
plans to apply for listing on Nasdaq National exchange
on 11/17 makes it clear to the informed investors that
they now have revenues (or were perpetual liars when they
made those past statements).
RB NSCT boards do have tons of garbage, but also have quite
a few extremely good investors who take a seasoned,
long-term approach, including some who have been
development managers/executives at chip companies, etc.
Esp. the moderated board I posted a link to - you can't
post to it unless board owner approves you, based on your
past posting record. Also, RB has 'ignore poster' feature
which is much better than SI's - you don't see any
trace of those posts at all, plus on the postive, RB has
"member mark" which makes posts by those 'marked' people
get highlighted for you.
>The patents do look promising but the company has
>been short on delivering results.
So far. |
