our system of morals on what is generally acceptable societal behavior is inextricably linked to natural law and the Judeo-Christian tradition. Perjury is referenced to the Ten Commandments, so is murder, so is theft, etc, etc.
While I would acknowledge that the constitution was primarily derived from Judeo-Christian morals, we have to go back and review where some of THOSE values were derived. There are numerous codes that are NOT derived from Judaism, such as the code of hammurabi and ancient greek and roman law, none of which were derived from Jewish law.
Ancient Israel was primarily a theocracy with a strong priesthood (sanhedrin, Sadduccees and Pharisees.. etc)
So while we may derive many of our moral values from Judaism, we have derived much of our legal structure from the greeks and romans.
And because we are a representative republic with separation between church and state, we must be careful not to compel non-christian/jewish secular citizens accepting a view on the beginnings of life.
Listen.. abortion existed at the founding of our nation. But none of our founding fathers believed it important enough to impart the right of citizenship at the point of conception (especially with the level of mortality and miscarriages at that time). Rather, they conveyed citizenship at time of birth.
Now I think we have progressed far enough to the point where I don't have to coerce non-believers into living under religiously derived beliefs about when life is conveyed, AND STILL limit the time frame in which a women can elect to have an abortion for the purpose of birth control.
I don't have to be a christian in order to make a sound and logical argument against 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions.
But as a Christian, I think that I should be happy with such an achievement of logic and not be so extremist that I provide secular citizens with powerful ammunition that I'm some kind of religious zealot who lives only to see the US become a Theocracy.
Limit abortion to the 1st trimester, except in cases of endangerment of the mother's life or greivous genetic defect that would render the child non-functional in society (and I know that last aspect is very contentious but that is where I think a just compromise can be derived that meets the interests of pregnant women and social morality).
Regards,
Ron |
