SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (1368)10/5/2000 11:55:24 PM
From: Fiscally Conservative  Read Replies (1) of 10042
 
I am not a liberal,but would like to comment on (why Al Gore does not want Social Security invested in stocks ect)

15% of what would be collected to be placed in Social Security would not,rather it would be placed at the whim of its' future recipient. There would be a 15% shortage in the Social Security Funds annual collection which would need to be accounted for. Anyone who believes that what he/she now pays out in Social Security taxes is set aside explicitly for their retirement not to be touch until then is wrong. What is collected each year is used in the General Fund and for distributions to current recipients. All this money is leveraged to balance this insane deficit which has been building for over 30 years. The consequences of an entitled investment senerio which Bush suggest would take an enormous amount of rebalancing of the books and prudent fiscal restraint for which Gore shows little of. Mainly,there would be 15%less of what the government collects in Social Security taxes available to play with. Gore is setting the stage for bigger government which costs $. Where will it all come from? Certainly not from SS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext