SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas Mercer-Hursh who wrote (32889)10/7/2000 4:39:07 PM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (4) of 54805
 
Thomas, it can be argued that the x86 architecture, because of the huge value chain there, is "fixed". INTC has not really made any architectural changes of significance that were not quickly answered by AMD. In fact, AMD engineered some features that INTC had to reverse engineer.

INTC seems to have no intent of further innovations in the 32bit arena and would have a very difficult time doing so because of the weight of the software and hardware architectures built around the x86 architecture as it is.

INTC has stated that the 64bit architecture will not support native 32bit execution. It will be emulated, which means it will not perform well. In the meantime, AMD has stated its intent to maintain 32bit native mode execution in its 64bit architecture.

INTC's 64bit architecture has a very weak value chain and its strengthening is not apparent. I don't see a tornado there for a while. They are going up against SUNW, the King of 64bit systems, imo.

LB convinced me some time ago that INTC is not a Gorilla. I have treated it like a King since.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext