Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 169.27

-4.8%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: William Hunt who wrote (3545)	10/9/2000 4:00:37 PM
From: 100cfm	Read Replies (1) of 197175

I find this latest twist in the Korean WCDMA-CDMA2000 saga a huge slap in Q's face. To think that the carrier who goes with CDMA2000 is getting stuck with the proverbial boobie prize and must be compensated is mind boggeling. What is the attraction to WCDMA, it can't be the technology, and the roaming issue isn't it since IJ stated that the net will soon make that a non issue. The only thing I can think of is It must be i-mode. All the carriers must want to be i-mode compatible at any cost. And when you really think about it, you can't blame the carriers for wanting so. Look at the success of i-mode with inferior technology compared to everyone else's wireless internet programs with superior technology. It's the i-mode stupid. Any other opinions?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next