Orbital Engine (OE) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Orbital Engine (OE)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John M Connolly who wrote (4512)	10/9/2000 6:44:59 PM
From: Maverick	Read Replies (1) of 4908

Look again at my post and then at the p.9 photo: My post clearly states the significance is that "direct injection" is on the SAME nameplate as Vortec (this is exactly why I also capitalized it in my original post). This is why OE needed "permission". Because they had somebody cast that piece using a trademark that didn't belong to them. Or better yet, GM cast it for them! But on the "Ford" engine, the part with "Ford" on it is an entirely different part than the part OE substituted with "OCP Direct Injection". OE had a new valve cover fabricated, and are using it to market their products, but it doesn't have someone else's trademarked logo on it. GM granted OE permission in some shape or form to use one of their very important trademarks that's now being used to market OE's products. It is significant. Wasn't my mention of the importance of the Delphi deal timely? I got lucky. Dr. Mike and Dwight, you both replied with very well written messages (thanks, I thought this board had about died). I will try to address those later tonight, tomorrow at the latest.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next