SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: robwin who wrote (33115)10/9/2000 8:02:50 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 35685
 
robwin,

"No one of your previous postings have done anything but buttress my arguments"
____________________________________________________________

AHEM............

First, let me point out that robwin & I have exchanged several PM's where I have used his own words compared to the facts, in context on the porch to clearly establish that he has lied..... repeatedly..... Nice try robwin. Slick, sneaky, underhanded & said with confidence. Still blatant lies, but you get extra credit for the deviousness of the action.

It doesn't change the fact you lied...... That's OK, I'll just take a few moments to post some of your public lies with sufficient proof to support it. Just the facts.
____________________________________________________________

From your post # 32847

Hi Bonnie,
I have been lurking here for a couple of months and have read most of the postings dealing with the Beano family and other pie in the sky (hindsight investing)"...


From your post # 33048

"I have been reading with amusement and some disgust at the blatant manipulation, half-truths, prevarications and outright falsehoods perpetuated on this thread and on the moderated porch...".....

.....I do however, get a kick out of the old postings of how many people were helped by his CC strategies.......

Hmmm... OK, we've established your claims to have read a significant # of porch posts..... BTW, care to provide verbatim quotes, in context, replete with links to support those claims in post # 33048? FWIW, I have already shown you to be a blatant liar in previous posts right here on this thread. You are also painfully aware of my replies to your PM's to me too....... I didn't think so.......

Anyway robwin, in post # 32847 you went on to say.....

...."I have sorely been tempted to ask Voltaire or any other brethern, if they ever have any losing trades...the thread had a sort of evangelical flavor to it...every one was smiling like they were high on something..."

I find it odd that you claim to have read so much of the porch, yet you missed countless posts where poeple have discussed real losses........... please read the following............. (FWIW, there are many more links at the bottom of this reply - they debunk this BS as well as other lies from robwin).......

siliconinvestor.com.

This is but one post that proves many things...... First, it proves you lie..... & as you now see, I know for a personal fact you are lying & intentionally deceitful..... folks did take losses as the post linked above clearly indicates (follow a few reply's back from that post & there is even more proof of your lies & intentional deceit).... there are numerous other posts proving others suffered losses.... in fact there were multiple ongoing discussions regarding said topic....

Want a few more examples off the top of my head? Here.... read the porch posts for these folks posts (right from their profile for easy access to their posts)....... Jim Willie CB..... Dr. David Gleitman..... elpolvo..... Annette..... Dealer..... techguerrilla..... freeus..... claptonsguitar..... INTCfan..... & me :-o There are more, but I think a few examples are sufficient to prove your lack of integrity & intent to deceive.

This sort of further destroys your preconceived bullchit, doesn't it?.... they look more & more like a bunch of lies used to push whatever agenda you have.
____________________________________________________________

From your post # 33048

Hi Bonnie,
I have been reading with amusement and some disgust at the blatant manipulation, half-truths, prevarications and outright falsehoods perpetuated on this thread and on the moderated porch...

Today was no different...as soon as things deviated from the Pontiff's vision, the excuses, the modifications, the defensiveness, the rationalizations and nit picking started...look at the flak and unfriendly remarks jmac received for the most benign of remarks about the Pontiff's holdings and strategies..."


robwin, RE:jmac..... if you were being publicly attacked with vicious lies, intentional deceit & slanderous, inflammatory personal attacks, you might be leery of harsh language from any corner...... BTW, Volt does receive a chitload of PM's daily, not to mention the sheer volume of posts on the porch sent to him..... Volt has said repeatedly he is a big picture man & jokingly said he had ADD.... it is more than reasonable he might miss that first question from jmac..... & subsequently become shocked to see such harsh language with absolutely no indication that jmac was joking....

Yup, I would have been harsh in my reply too & IMHO, Volt was only mildly harsh.... & his tone immediately changed when jmac explained himself...... robwin, look at how hard you are trying to spin Volt's single reply into some horrific widespread overt cult like action.... BTW it isn't remotely close to the disgusting, underhanded crap you & b-i-a pull, that's for damned sure. Oh, one more thing.... read jmac's posts on the thread that nnight..... Seems he never had a problem doesn't it? Seems jmac & Voltaire cleared up the misunderstanding & continue to converse like mature adults..... So what exactly was your point here? Did I here you say intentional deception???

Anyway, you went on to say.....

....."The Pontiff doesn't even have the intestinal fortitude to admit he may have erred (must be the Infallibilty thing)...I particuarly like the latest mantra, (live and die with INTC just like the Houses)...well, I am not particularly concerned that the Houses will fall if INTC doesn't recover but I do feel sorry for those individuals that followed this course of action...(I know he said it was a GAMBLE, that's the "cover your ass" posting)..."

Hmmm, the same crap that b-i-a tried..... I wonder if she got the idea from your post..... please read the following for pertinent facts on Volt's INTC call.....

Message 14538048

It seems it was totally different than you portrayed it, don't you think? Can you say intentional lies?????

& post # 33048 went on with even more......

"......Never underestimate the human need "to belong"....there is always more security in a group...

What is the Pontiff's true motive(s)? Who knows...I do however, get a kick out of the old postings of how many people were helped by his CC strategies...LOL...reminds of the old Ken Roberts mailing I used to get...

Eventually, people will catch on...it may take a few large losses..some won't care...they just like the company, in cyberspace..."


Please read each & every link provided below, plus the posts they reply to & the replies to the posts linked. It will debunk the above BS rather handily.
____________________________________________________________

From your post # 32866

"I seem to be getting pm's about my earlier comments".....

Yes you did. Some were from me pointing out the lies & deceit with facts & links. You can choose to deny this to be true, but you & I both know it happened......... Anyway, you also said in that post.....

....."Oh, and I forgot they have "community standards" on the moderated thread...wonderful euphemism for silencing any dissenters who do not offer critical opinions couched in the appropriate reverential tones...really does remind me of a cross between an Amway meeting and the early days of Nazi Germany....

Never ceases to amaze me as to what lengths people will go to protect persons who tell them what they want to hear, even when it is based on misinformation, half-truths and self-delusion....


robwin, there was & continues to be disagreements between Voltaire & others, numerous ongoing heated debates, etc., & no one on the moderated porch has been silenced with the exception of b-i-a..... & we both know that was for clearly obvious reasons....... links at the bottom prove this quite well.......
____________________________________________________________

From your post # 32935

......."Are we supposed to take as gospel your twisted regurgitation of previous postings as being the last word?"............

From your post # 32937

"What documented records?
Sworn statements made under oath?
Depositions?
Inconsistent testimony before a grand jury?
Please, stop making a nuisance and an ass of yourself...go back to the moderated board where you can receive much needed positive affirmation from your cohorts...you will be much happier there..."


robwin, how else would you suggest someone respond to blatant lies & deceit when there is an electronic record of what really transpired that clearly conflicts with your lies & deceit?? I guess you would rather not have the real facts used to expose you to be the blatant liar, 'eh?
____________________________________________________________

"Rose,
These people are pros at their craft, that is all I have to say...psychological games galore... "


robwin, I suggest you read all the posts linked & referenced herein...... They are simply the facts that prove you to be a liar...... It seems that you are trying to play games.... with the truth & the facts.......
____________________________________________________________

From your post # 33055

......"I had to chuckle when I saw you reprint the entire SI terms of use page in response to Gregory's posting on the moderated board...the poor man wasn't trying to attack the fearless leader...it was fairly tame, why did you spring to his defence?".........

robwin, if you read that post you saw that I took no offense to Gregory's post & even agreed with him. I just used that post to get on my soapbox..... I have been known to do that at times. You see, I just don't buy BS, plain & simple. Here is the link to that post......

Message 14499092

Please note that I said to Gregory...... "Although you make some valid points Gregory,......"
....."Again, I agree your post has some merit.".......

He also followed up with a reply both on the moderated porch & right here.......

siliconinvestor.com

Message 14500454

Seems you are going to extremes with your BS on this point, 'eh robwin.....
____________________________________________________________

Please read the following posts AND click on the post being responded to as well as the replies to the linked post.. I believe that you will find sufficient proof that many of your claims from you are pure BS..........

Message 14435749

Message 14435476

Message 14239217

Message 14238940

Message 14239072

Message 14345151

Message 14340229

Message 14335779

Message 14234333

Message 14233853

Message 14233659

Message 14233155

FWIW, these posts & the concurrent discussions surrounding them are just more nails in your coffin in numerous ways...... I could provide countless more evidence to prove you to be a blatant liar with an agenda........ or could it be you are extremely incompetent, slovenly, remisslessly careless, rude & over-opinionated person who is prone to jumping to conclusions without any real basis to do so?

If you can't make your point without lies & intentional deceit, you just might find me there pointing it out to you.

robwin, if the shoe fits...... it likely means you have opened your big trap far to wide.

Ö¿Ö
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext