SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : IRS, Tax related strategies--Traders

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: donjuan_demarco who wrote (1223)10/9/2000 8:30:47 PM
From: Colin Cody  Read Replies (2) of 1383
 
donjuan, I'd have to agree - if the IRA was not owned by the seller of the stock or his relative and the IRA did not name as a beneficiary or trustee the seller of the stock or his relative and therefore was a totally unrelated party with regards the seller, then naturally one wouldn't expect the loss to be disallowed!

Unless (upon rereading your reply) you meant that the IRA bought FROM an unrelated party, in which case I'd have to say that who they buy FROM or sell TO makes little, if any, difference for the wash sale rules and the related party rules for disallowance of losses to apply.

Colin
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext