SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (1963)10/10/2000 11:14:23 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 10042
 
Nope. I disagree. People who own pools and people who use pools make a choice to expose themselves to the risk. They do this for themselves and for their children.

With a gun ban or extreme regulation you would still be exposed to the risk of guns because criminals would not obey the ban, and then the criminals would know that you are very unlikely to have a gun.

You want everyone to assume the risk for the people who own guns. You want people to own weapons- do you want the
backgrounds checked? Do you think the mentally ill should own handguns? Should children play with them in the street?
Should they be allowed at school? If not why not- since they are "safer than pools" which most schools have.


Background checks have some potential beneifits but they are also subject to abuse. Actual current abuse includes people who are entitled to recieve guns (or concealed carry permits for guns) being rejected because the person or group
controling the permisson in some areas is anti-gun. Look at NYC for example. Guns are technically legal but it is almost impossible to get them (unless you are a criminal). Theoretical abuse that could potentially happen includes a future opressive government useing the records to round up guns or gun owners. Should the mentally ill own handguns? PRobably not. Should children play with them in the street? No, but will gun control stop this? How? Should they be allowed in school? Probably not but 1 - You don't have to regulate guns in general to control a particular area. 2 - Murderous studentscan probably get guns in without a ban stopping them atleast if you don't have very tough security measures and 3 - The gun ban for schools should be enforced in a reasonable way. A case where it wasn't - A vice principal went and got a gun from his care and stoped a violent armed student, then got in a lot of trouble for bringing a gun in to school; another case - A student was suspended for having a minuture plastic GI Joe gun in school. Most schools have pools? I had never been in one that had a pool until I went to a university.

I've never said I want them all taken away- but regulation, definitely.

Well I'm glad you don't want a ban but many do. As for regulation there is all ready a lot of regulation. Some of which is not enforced, and a lot of which is useless and arbitrary.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext