SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 249.89+3.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (38024)10/10/2000 3:12:00 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (3) of 70976
 
<<I think the new variable now is the shorts

>I do not think this is a variable. Only about 14M shares short with 810M outstanding is not likely to cause any short squeeze.

Not in AMAT, but perhaps LRCX and some others. Many smaller investment houses (small firms like $100M or so) won't touch LRCX as it is too small but AMAT is a blue chip and much larger market cap (this is a fact from first hand conversations)

Also, a squeeze makes the stock go up. I'm saying some of the volitility downward can come from shorters... IF nobody is in a buying mood, then extra pressure from shorts will add to the down effect.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext