SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : LL Knickerbocker(KNIC)/Pure Energy Corp

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Arcane Lore who wrote (873)10/12/2000 3:08:13 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (1) of 1028
 
From today's SEC Digest:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING INSTITUTED AGAINST BROKER-DEALER AND THREE OTHERS

On October 10, the Commission instituted a public administrative and cease and desist proceeding against Shamrock Partners, Ltd. (ROCK), James Kelly (Kelly), John Doyle (Doyle), and Stephen Fischer (Fischer). ROCK is a registered broker-dealer based in Media, Pennsylvania, Kelly is ROCK's owner, Doyle is ROCK's principal trader, and Fischer was a trader at a second brokerage firm. The Division of Enforcement alleges that during the summer of 1995, each respondent had a role in the stock manipulation of The L. L. Knickerbocker Co. Inc. (KNIC). From July 3 to August 11, 1995, KNIC's stock price rose from $6 to $52. Shortly thereafter the stock dropped 38%. The Division of Enforcement alleges that Kelly and ROCK engaged in secret sales that helped maintain KNIC's artificially high stock price, and that they failed reasonably to supervise Rafi Khan, a broker subject to their supervision during KNIC's price rise. The Division of Enforcement also alleges that Doyle, who acted as a KNIC market maker, had a collusive trading arrangement with Fischer, who also acted as a KNIC market maker at another brokerage firm, and that the arrangement contributed to KNIC's price rise. A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the allegations are true and, if so, what, if any, remedial sanctions are appropriate. (Rels. 33-7909; 34-43425; File No. 3-10344)

sec.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext