SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob who wrote (45499)10/12/2000 4:02:40 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) of 769668
 
As someone said--although I believe he was arguing the other side of the issue-- the law goes into motivation and intent already during a trial. Even initially, we make certain determinations when we bring the charge (first degree, second, etc)against someone.

Trying to equate special hate crimes with some higher moral stance is a specious argument. A crime the nature of the one committed against James Byrd outrages us all and we do feel a strong need to avenge his death, to exact our pound of flesh. Hate crime laws are attractive for this reason. They are gratifying. They have enormous emotional appeal, but no legal necessity. The convicted should receive the toughest punishment available without our needing to rely on the victim being a member of a specific target group to justify a different or more severe sentence.

People are saying that minorities won;t vote for Bush because his refusing to agree that minorities need special status is discriminatory. I see it as the opposite-- a declaration that we are all equal under the law- perpetrators AND victims.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext