SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: horsegirl48 who wrote (32891)10/13/2000 1:48:38 PM
From: donald sew  Read Replies (3) of 42787
 
Horsegirl,

I am really focused on statistics. Per my previous research I did not evalute the statistical probability of retests that took 5 months, if there were any. So I cannot make a firm conclusion based on statistics.

I can say that I feel that 5 months seems too long for a pattern. I recall someone quoting from some rule that extended patterns beyond 3-4 months lacks reliability. That comment was applied to a discussion we had on WEDGES. I feel that such rule could be applied to probably all patterns. It doesnt mean that it cant be a double bottom retest, just seems too long.

My suspicion is that at best we are in another trading range, I did say at best. We need to keep in mind that the most current trend is down producing lower lows. If a lower high is produced then the downtrend remains intact, so lets see how high this takes us.

Also keep in mind with chart patterns that a smaller chart pattern can develop in a larger chart pattern. Lets say there is a large upward trend channel, but within the trend channed there could be a bearish something developing. So the smaller/more recent moves are more meaningful since that smaller pattern could negate the bigger one.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext