SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.53+1.5%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (13770)10/13/2000 3:24:31 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
<power consumption of P4> Intel only gave power for the 1.3 and 1.4, and that was 36 amps at 1.7v and 39 amps at 1.7v, respectively. So 1.5 GHz would be 42 amps at 1.7v, assuming that the voltage doesn't have to go up, or 71.4 watts.

1.6 GHz, if it needed an extra 0.1v would be at 80 watts at least. We don't know whether the transistors in the P4 will suffer from the same speed degradation at high temperatures or whether they will work fine all the way to 90 degC, but I suspect that if they haven't changed the process, they will have the same problems at high temp, which is really due to the notched gates.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext