Lamont, It's not only SDWSF that investors are second guessing in their portfolios!!! The are the likes of CREE, ADBE (though a nice rebound on Friday), MS, KANA, RHAT, DCLK, ICGE, AMD, etc.
I actually have been impressed with the progress made during the last 10 months but, we (SDWSF/SYDu.V) need to take a bite more aggressive approach to sales, and see a follow through on the Siebel Certification...
I'm now starting to wonder if it's not Siebel, rather than, Dr.Bean, that is not compatible and scaleable to Industry Standards!!!
It would be very similar to all the existing Flavors of Unix masquerading as an Industry Standard!!! Like with SUN, they keep Solaris and their developer level (DT environment) of IXI Motif a bit Proprietary, i.e., OpenLook, Motif, CDE...yet your pretty safe if program at the X intrinsic level...
I would equate this to Universal acceptability...which on paper, sounds great, very similar, and compromised, when a vendor adds extensions to Linux (it's no longer Universal, re: CORL, RHAT LNUX)...now that's where Sideware has the edge using JAVA...thought this can generate it's own set of problems based on versions (extentions to JAVA and/or Browsers) of , and lack of a standards in JDKs...
I'm really staring to think it's not a problem with Dr.Bean conforming to the Siebel product line, rather, it's a problem of the Siebel Product line not conforming to Open System Standards!!!
I've got a couple dozen PMs, then other posts to respond to, so BCNU...
Later...Gator |
