PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PALM - The rebirth of Palm Inc.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: David E. Taylor who wrote (2168)	10/15/2000 6:13:22 PM
From: KevRupert	Read Replies (2) of 6784

Thread & David, Yes, I am referring to color screens. Could someone post or send a pm to me with answers to the following questions: 1) Why is there such a discrepancy between the Hewlett-Packard 548 & Compaq iPaq color screens compared to the Palm IIIC? Or for that matter, why has Palm been behind in the time frame in introducing an equally comparable color screen on any product? --I believe the answer can not be a weight issue due to the iPaq only weighing 6.3 oz. with many features. --My initial reaction is the reason must be a component shortage, including availability of color screens. I am asking only to become familiar with the reasons for the product variances. I continue to search for an explanation for why there is a discrepancy between competing PDA models -- and their respective specifications. I assume that whatever the answer is -- it can also answer the reason why the MB/MHZ is less than the competitors. No disprespect intended for Palm products. I am only trying to understand, and I can't find any articles or links that answer these questions. Thanks for any feedback.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next