SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Boca_PETE who wrote (10351)10/16/2000 10:55:04 AM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) of 42834
 
A buy signal at this juncture would be totally inconsistent with his latest views expressed on the program.

Perhaps not. He did say he expected the NASDAQ to drop between 40 and 70%... We kissed the 40%...again... and didn't tank on threat or Middle East War and $36 Oil.

I've owned IBM since way back with a doubling down in Jan 93 (a bit early) and I discovered this chart last night:
stockmaster.com

Note how IBM actually had MORE GROWTH than the NASDAQ and got ahead of itself last year near $140. It corrected nearly 30-40% to under $100 and has slowly traded higher.

I superimposed a NASDAQ line on the chart and propose that this index might do the same thing. Before, I was comparing the NASDAQ chart to that of the 1987-1991 DJIA, but it might make more sense to compare it to IBM? Anyway, in both cases, the 40% drop was right at the beginning followed by trading to higher levels with time as time healed over valuation.

I have no crystal ball, but I don't see an index getting over valued then using sector rotation to correct and slowing wait for valuation to catch up.

Bob has ONLY RECENTLY started to talk about PEG (he says he talked to an analyst he respects and was told 2 times the growth rate is fine.) and PEG analysis does give you the line the IBM and NASDAQ graphs show.

Hmmm....

I imagine subscribers are sure watching their mailboxes carefully! 8)

regards
Kirk out
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext