Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jas244 who started this subject	10/16/2000 3:59:11 PM
From: David W. Taylor	Read Replies (2) of 2013

Conexant 46.83% Under Valued ?? Possibly. There was an interesting article in the SF Chronicle this morning about valuengine.com, a site that analyses stocks and produces statistical information about them. Try this URL valuengine.com MSFT is theoretically 44.70% undervalued. INTC is theoretically 48.14% undervalued. CSCO is theoretically 23.89% undervalued. AMAT is theoretically 42.44% undervalued. On the other hand, CNXT's 1 year target price is $39.81, which from $35 is a 13.7% gain. For my own part the great risk in owning CNXT vs a 7% FDIC insured CD yield, justifies the safe and lower yield of the CD but your mileage may vary. Their comments on the types of traders is also interesting: ATTRACTIVE to Growth-at-Reasonable-Prices Investors ATTRACTIVE to Balanced Investors UNATTRACTIVE to Classic-Value Investors Given that I am definitely the Classic-Value variety and most on this board are self-avowed Growth-at-Reasonable-Prices or Balanced, this seems to be the first note of sanity, that I have seen for a long time. Comments?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next