SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (126256)10/17/2000 10:23:19 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) of 1580223
 
Daniel,

re: "John, in case you didn't notice, AMD didn't browbeat the analysts into counting the comm division sale as normal income. Somewhat in contrast to Intel's Micron sale..."

Yes, I noticed. Maybe I can explain. Intel intends it's Intel Capital group to be an ongoing business. As with any of their business segments the performance, profit or loss, should be included in their business results. Does it make any sense not to include a segment of their business?

AMD's sale of their comm division was a one time event, non-recurring. Would it make sense to include those numbers in AMD's future valuation, and expectation?

Intel Capital is a two edged sword, at some point in time they will have to pay the price for the losers in their portfolio, if they sell or if the company, that they own stock in, goes out of business.

So if you are thinking really short term, you can claim that Intel is cheating on earnings. Or you can wait until they have to take a capital loss against their operating earnings (that will happen sooner or later), and then you can gloat. But you can't have it both ways.

John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext