Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 39.96

-1.5%

10:28 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: andy kelly who wrote (113954)	10/17/2000 3:01:13 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Andy, RE:'Since you work with chip sets, could I ask you a question. I have been wondering why, with so much riding on a successful launch of P4, Intel did not design two different chip sets for it." ___ This shows tremendous arrogance on Intels part...and stupidity. I'm not Tench, obviously, but Intel signed an agreement with Rambus to promote Rambus as it's "favored" memory. Intel managent obviously thought they didn't need a DDR or SDRAM chipset for Willamette. I also still think a lot of these decisions were made with cornering the market and profit in mind rather than customers wants and needs. Intel has lose tremendous credibility at setting standards because of this. Also, Intel has a history of NOT adopting other parties technologies and tying themselves up. Apples firewire being one, Intel opting for USB-1 and USB-2. They always were the leader. For some strange reason they were bamboozled by Rambus...hummm Jim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next