Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO 78.03

+0.8%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GVTucker who wrote (40981)	10/17/2000 5:03:49 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (2) of 77399

GV, In all due respect - and you deserve it. And if you rebuke bambs for making a statement without any quantitative backup, the least you could do is provide some of your own to support your opinion that his statements are asinine. I find this a hard pill to swallow and have seen this same sentiment posted in the past many times. It assumes that a poster can post anything he/she likes without any factual basis. From there (as the sentiment goes) it becomes the responsibility of those with a differing opinion to post facts which debase the original post. I disagree with this. I think it's appropriate for respondent to request facts from the originator which support the claim. If the original poster can't support their position then that poster should recant or at a minimum be discredited. In this case the respondent is potentially being discredited because they don't care to respond to a baseless/ridiculous post. Does this make any sense?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next