LINUX Message Board - Msg: 14601866

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LINUX

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E. Charters who wrote (2334)	10/17/2000 6:22:25 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) of 2615

I found FVWM 2.2.4 to be just a tad piggier than 1.2.4 But I found no added features that I cared for. For a window manager I don't know of any added features that I'd want beyond 1.2.4. Since 1.2.4 Window manager development has been about emulating the beautifully designed OS of the month by Bill Gates. The reality to me is that Linux is so fragmented that a common core of functionality will never occur and MSFT dominance will continue as a very high percentage of users. There are industrial apps that will go to Linux, but not the desktop. It's to hard for even me to keep up. Sound and java and netscape are all areas fraught with incompatibility. The last distributions 6.1 mandrake have the 1.2.4 rpm. I'm waiting for 7.? from redhat and mandrake. I'd assume that there is no problem in running 1.2.4 on current distributions. I've found that gnome apps run on fvwm so that at that level problems are not being introduced this five minutes. Tom Watson tosiwmee

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next