SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brendan2012 who wrote (23280)5/23/1997 9:38:00 AM
From: jwk   of 58324
 
>>You speak with a certainty that makes it sound like you are in some way connected to Iomega.<<

Brenda -- Trust no one on the 'net!!! . . . particularly, those who post with "screen names" and no email address. Longs here tend to jump all over perceived short shennaigans, but tolerate quite a bit of dubious "loose cannon longs".

"Mr. Iomega" was questioned about his identity a few days ago and denied being who the poster suggested he was. However, his post #19186 suggests otherwise.

Be careful about accepting information as true just because it is what you want to hear.

I would like very much for what "Mr. Iomega" says to be true, but I would never invest a nickle based on it without being able to confirm it to my satisfaction with a couple of other "reliable" sources.

FM is right, I for one would like to see more formation and less cheerleading. Perhaps someone would like to start an IOM cheerlading thread where we could go and cheer to our hearts content .

I expect the price to steadily improve over the next couple of quarters, but I cringe a bit at the thought of what could take place on this thread with every 1/2 point rise.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext