Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 43.75

+0.6%

Dec 3 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (114481)	10/19/2000 12:17:12 AM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Re: "One anonymous person posted on a messageboard that a 1.5GHz P4 will do 524 in specfp2000 and 502 in specint2000 with the 5.0 compiler. Of course, this IS a random person so it should be taken with a BIG grain of salt. But the numbers fit the speculation that P4 isn't too good in integer clock for clock. THe fp score seems reasonable because of SSE2" Those numbers are far far ahead of anything AMD has dreamed of and are world class, even in FP, and those numbers still may be conservative, we'll just have to wait and see.....<G> I think it's time to realize that regardless of the IPC, the real issue is total performance from a given process. Who cares if the IPC is slightly lower, if the overall performance is higher? EP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next