SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (1807)10/19/2000 12:43:34 AM
From: Krowbar  Read Replies (2) of 28931
 
Now X, are you referring to me when you say that atheists are just as silly as theists? My disbelief in god is not absolute, but is based on the lack of evidence for a god, and the immense amount of evidence to support evolution, an unguided Universe, and our being here purely by random chance events. I am willing to consider evidence for the existence of a god or gods, but have seen nothing but peoples' wishing that there was one.

There are no certainties, only probabilities. I believe, based on the empirical evidence, that it is highly probable that there is no god. What do you find silly about that? Is the disbelief in the existence of Zeus and other gods then also silly?

In my book (the book of probabilities), atheism is an entirely rational, reasoned out, belief. God is possible, but not probable. It is silly to have a belief unsupported by evidence, but not silly to not believe it.

Del
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext