SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
IDCC 371.89+1.9%Nov 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: w molloy who wrote (4542)10/19/2000 12:12:26 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (3) of 5195
 
1) With 160 engineers, IDCC finally seems to have staffed a serious ASIC effort. The begged question is how they could claim to offer ASIC solution(s) without a fully staffed project.

As usual, Molloy, you sound like you know what you're talking about, but you're really saying nothing. Ever since the Nokia contract was signed in early 1999, IDCC has been proceeding on two major projects: WCDMA-TDD (with Nokia) and WCDMA-FDD (independently). The top priority was naturally given to the TDD project even though Nokia expects the TDD version of WCDMA to roll in after the FDD version in the hierarchical cell structure of WCDMA.

IDCC's ability to hire engineers at a rapid clip during the early stages of an industry price war indicates, at the very least, that IDCC has a credible wireless program, nothing more, nothing less.

I was expecting a more radical approach, with quite a bit more detail

What? And roll the dice again with a radical program with a more vague time to market? LOL. If there's anything this company needs right now, it is to develop new wireless products for 2G, 2.5G and 3G given how the estimates of technology adoption have become more realistic. Something further along the lines of the Ubinetics deal which, as you recall, initially focused on practical wireless products for GSM and TDMA networks.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext