SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 43.48+8.6%Dec 2 3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jcholewa who wrote (114525)10/19/2000 1:46:56 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Re: "If they said that, then they are mistaken"

You put us in the unenviable position of having to believe either you or AMD. It was widely reported on the AMD thread that AMD's VP stated there were no architectural changes other than cache. I didn't hear it myself. I'll remain skeptical.

Re: "Thank you for clarifying that P858 is the 180nm process. Do they have a subdesignation for this current version with the notched poly gate things? I mean, there must have been some noting for the possibly process-related tweak that brought the Coppermine down to 90sqmm, no?"

I think it was just the normal process shrink that happens as a process matures. I expect they have a number of variations running for different products. Process is not really my field.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News