SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (126782)10/24/2000 6:15:31 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (1) of 1577586
 
OT

Re:"The US Supreme Court has never ruled that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms"

The US Supreme Court has indeed ruled that there is no individual right "to keep and bear arms" but instead the right to bear arms is related to the maintenance of a well regulated State militia.

abanet.org

In Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980), the Court ruled that restrictions contained in the Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibiting felons from owning firearms were constitutional. Using a "rational basis" standard, the Court held that the restrictions "do not trench upon any constitutionally protected liberties." Further, the Court reaffirmed the position first established in U.S. v. Miller that "the Second Amendment guarantees no right to keep and bear a firearm that does not have ‘some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia’".

The State militia known in colonial times no longer exists. It has been replaced with the National guard that is maintained, armed and regulated by the US. The State militias have been replaced with a standing army that includes the National Guard.

Links to the full text of the Supreme court opinions are found in the abanet.org link.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext