SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.82+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jdaasoc who wrote (58929)10/26/2000 5:04:24 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
John, <Which drives obsolense of memory, price or performance>

Remember that when EDO was king and SDRAM was introduced, the hardware enthusiasts only found a 3-5% increase in real-world performance. Then when SDRAM moved from PC66 to PC100, the hardware enthusiasts once again only found a 3-5% increase in performance. Same thing w/ PC100 to PC133.

I guess if DDR really does show 10-15% improvement in performance over PC133, that in itself is remarkable. However, I suspect those sizable improvements are affected by two factors:

- The much faster ramp-up of processor speeds. For example, AMD is blazing away with 1.2 GHz Athlons, yet they're still very limited by a memory channel that is running at one-ninth the speed of the processor.

- Marketing. "TeamDDR" will naturally want to exaggerate the benefits of DDR in order to drive its acceptance into the marketplace. As Intel already proved with RDRAM and 820, real-world performance can be miles away from the rosy scenario that you present.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext