SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Berger Tech Fund, GY SWC ITW Lord Abbett Large Cap GF

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Pueblo who wrote (6)10/27/2000 12:27:31 AM
From: Mark Johnson  Read Replies (2) of 22
 
Chicken,

Your right, what I wrote can be confusing.

In recent editions of the online version the wording
has been changed a little.

In 1998, 225 different specific stock ideas appeared in
the IFC. As of July 5, 1999, the return of the group
of stocks that appeared in the IFC in 1998 rose an
astounding 51%. What is even more amazing is that in 1999,
185 stocks appeared in this column and as of July 3, of
2000, that group of stocks was up 56%.


All of the stocks were calculated using a percentage basis.
I suppose if you invested $100, $1,000 or even
$1 million in each stock idea when it was mentioned
in 1999, your portfolio
would have been up 56.32% as of July 3, 2000.

Yes, the NASDAQ as you pointed out was at and went to:
COMP Jan 1, 1999 - 2207
COMP July 3, 2000 - 4023

The stock ideas that appeared in January of 1999, had
about 18 months to appreciate but at the same
time the stocks mentioned in December only had
about 6 months to appreciate.

Hope this helps.

Mark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext