SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 92.37-0.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (59030)10/27/2000 4:52:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Jim, <This sounds like a simple marketing decision to de-rate the product so as to minimize cannibalization from the WS business>

I seriously doubt it. If Intel had the chance to make their mainstream platform perform the best it could, they would have. Like Kash already pointed out, the workstation market is only a small fraction of the entire PC market.

<I don't see any technical issues regarding heat or power that would be expensive or difficult ot overcome. After all, Intel solved these problems easily for the i840.>

It could have been signal interference which gets exacerbated as heat rises. The 840's six-layer motherboard (among other things) takes care of the interference issues, but six-layer motherboards are more expensive.

I'm sure there are a lot of other issues the engineers had to overcome. These sorts of issues aren't stuff that they'd normally talk about in public, since they're your basic engineering "challenges" that need to be overcome. My suspicion is that RDRAM had more than their fair share of engineering "challenges." And Intel is getting tired of pushing these issues by themselves, especially now that the rest of the industry seems reluctant to help Intel out.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext