Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 93.35

+2.2%

Jan 9 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jim kelley who wrote (59069)	10/28/2000 2:41:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) of 93625

elly, These comments from a former Intel employee and Rambus shareholder, past or present, pretty much reflect mine. RE:"To: Barry Grossman who wrote (115057) From: Paul Engel Saturday, Oct 28, 2000 1:32 PM ET Reply # of 115060 Barry said- Re: 'Does this mean that all those media stories we saw heralding the end of the Intel/Rambus relationship were overexaggerated and biased just a wee bit? ' Pauls reply... The stories - whether biased or not - reflect reality. Intel is committed to introducing the Pentium 4 with the i850/Tehama/Rambus chip set - but they are workingy feverishly to create new chip sets with SDRAM and DDR support for the Pentium 4 - as well as non-DRDRAM chip sets for the upcoming Tulaltin/Pentium III. The Intel and Rambus divorce lawyers are working on an out-of-court "Divorce" settlement - but make no mistake - a divorce is in the works. Intel has to choose their words carfeully - the dipstick Intel lawyers apparently committed Intel to a "no-crticize" clause - pertaining to TECHNICAL MERITS of DRDRAM - in the original Rambus agreements. Tom DumbLap at his usual best. Paul ---- I wonder how much Intel will have to give up to divorce themselves from bride turned gorilla, Rambus? Rambus could be really rich! LOL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next