SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 99.21+8.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (59122)10/29/2000 3:10:51 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Hi Zeev Hed; Re Jazio vs Rambus technology...

Jazio has got a lot of exposure at DDR forums. Here's their website, click around on it, they are providing a simple technique for getting 2GHz signals out of current SDRAM structures:
jazio.com

Rambus did not come up with a radical new technology for sending signals down a wire. All they did was apply high speed techniques to memory, with some modifications to make it work in CMOS. But they really didn't provide any new technology that had not previously appeared in CMOS. The new Rambus idea, 4-level signalling, is probably not going to see the light of day, my guess, it just doesn't provide much advantage compared to the headaches involved.

All the stuff that Rambus thought was their brilliant ideas for modern memory turned out to be useless except for the latency register. They didn't even suggest the modern use of the latency register in their original patents, but that is the one piece of IP that the memory people are worried about. Their original use of the latency register was to allow for different time of flight from RAM to controller. The JEDEC use is to provide for differences in speed grades in SDRAM production, time of flight doesn't enter into it. Apparently, neither they nor JEDEC thought that the Rambus patents applied to SDRAM's use of that register. But Rambus got the patent examiners to explicitly apply their patent to the SDRAM technology, and now we have a big patent fight.

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext