Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.34

-2.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Amy J who wrote (115140)	10/29/2000 6:04:23 PM
From: Tony Viola	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Amy, RE: "Intel didn't put the "A" engineering team on the initial Rambus evaluation. They put the "D" team on it (or none at all)." --------------------- >>This is not true. OK, then why did they mess up the design so bad? Even before that, why did they go with such a risky interface design that Rambus is for something not in "the top ten" for PC performance? You don't need 400 MHz signals, with data present on both edges (800 Mbit/sec.) on the memory interface in a PC. It just is not necessary, and using "normal" digital design techniques to implement it just does not cut it. If they used an "A" team, it did not include people with VHF design experience, or they weren't heeded. Something went wrong. Tony

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next