SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 267.87-0.6%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (38957)10/30/2000 2:33:02 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Michael, one potential problem with your rosy scenario for the market is that if either party took both Congress and the presidency, then the President could end up getting what he wants. My greatest fear is that either candidate might actually keep his campaign promises.

Much has been made of the politicians' success in getting Greenspan to say that tax cuts are better than spending increases if paying down the debt cannot be done. But the fact that he has consistently said that his FIRST choice by a mile is paying down the debt is ignored. Why is this significant? Because EITHER tax reduction OR spending increases would be stimulative to the economy, which could force Greenspan to continue raising rates. The market would not like that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext