SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 275.19+3.0%3:30 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (38970)10/30/2000 3:52:48 PM
From: daryll40  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
The whole woman's choice issue has become very clouded. I cannot understand how this faction stood by and allowed young women (Paula Jones, Monica, and that other one who said Clinton raped her) to be taken advantage of by a powerful politician. They told us in 1991, at the Clarence Thomas hearings, that women don't lie about stuff like that and that a mere joke about a pubic hair on a can should keep a man from an office that he was otherwise qualified for. You know the rest of the story. So that group has little credibility. What they're saying is that CERTAIN women should have rights. And THEY KNOW BETTER who those women are.

Abortion is a tough issue. But picking one candidate over the other based solely on that one issue, as proven above, is a fools game.

Daryll40
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext