SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates -- VSEA

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Demosthenes who wrote (1152)10/30/2000 9:17:49 PM
From: dantecristo   of 1929
 
Boys, meet Ms. Jane Crisler and VSEA SLAPP witness:

FALCON: Now after your deposition that I took here in this office of March of this year are you aware of whether or not any outside law enforcement agency was contacted regarding the claim of sabotage occurring in Sue Felch's lab?
CRISLER: No.
FALCON: What I'm trying to do is quantify subsequent acquired knowledge, okay. At the last session you said that there was a final report.
CRISLER: I need a break.
FALCON: Please.
(Whereupon, was a fifteen-minute break.)
FALCON: On the record.
McMAHON: Let the record reflect that the witness was not able to continue with the deposition. I encouraged her to take extra time. We did so. She felt that she was not able to continue with the deposition and is extremely reluctant to come back, and so this deposition is I guess concluded at this point and I would like to under the terms of the protective order --
FALCON: Well, before we get to that, what's the basis for her inability to continue?
McMAHON: She's physically unable to continue the deposition.

Why did Ms. Crisler drive away with a question pending about "the claim of sabotage occurring in Sue Felch's lab"?
Do you think this is why VSEA wants to silence me?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext