SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 43.75+0.6%Dec 3 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe NYC who wrote (115345)10/31/2000 12:31:47 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Joe, >Here's a great present, AMD -- from your good friend, Intel. The microprocessor king is forfeiting the mainstream desktop GHz clock race to its closest competitor for the next nine months -- until Intel fields its own comparable speed-grade desktop processors in mid-2001.

From what Otellini was quoted as saying in a JP Morgan report that Albert posted, P4 may ramp fast enough to make that "forfeiting" word look stupid:

Mr. Otellini said that Intel's confidence in P4 and
its ability to ramp to volume production naturally has increased as the
launch date has gotten closer. P4 will not be narrowly targeted at
workstations and servers like the Pentium Pro back in 1995. Mr. Otellini
was rather frank about the die size issue: The PC market is not as strong
as Intel had expected, which frees up some capacity to ramp P4 faster. In
effect, Intel has committed to fixed manufacturing costs, which means that
using the capacity to make more P4s is "free" compared with not using the
capacity at all. On the infrastructure side, Intel is comfortable with
both availability and cost and sees no "volume limiters."


Being Intel, P4 volumes may still give them the volume X GHz factor award (multiply P4s X GHz shipped at, compared with Athlons X GHz shipped at). We shall see.

Tony
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext